There are a number of alternative cases to consider while investigating the dynamics of the Kuramoto Model. We can say the following, for small values of N [7];
Considering K < Kc gives rise to a variety of possible dynamics. If the coupling constant K = 0 the Kuramoto model is reduced to simple uncoupled oscillator dynamics represented by θi = ωi for i=1,...,N. Hence, the system exhibits periodic or quasi periodic rotations on the N-dimensional torus TN [2].
When K increases above zero (but remains small, ie. 0 < K < Kcr) the dynamics of the system are perturbed and for N > 3 they often become chaotic [7]. This transition to chaos occurs in accordance to the Afraimovich-Shilnikov torus breakdown scenario. When Kcr < K < Kc we always get a stable periodic orbit.
- K > Kc always leads to synchronised behaviour (either partial synchrony, or total synchrony).
- K = 0 removes coupling from the system, reducing behaviour to that of simple uncoupled oscillators.
- 0 < K < Kc with N < 4 will lead to periodic anti-synchoronous behaviour.
- 0 < K < Kcr < Kc with N > 3 often (but not always) encourages a variety of chaotic behaviours.
- Kcr < K < Kc with N > 3 leads to a stable periodic orbit.
Considering K < Kc gives rise to a variety of possible dynamics. If the coupling constant K = 0 the Kuramoto model is reduced to simple uncoupled oscillator dynamics represented by θi = ωi for i=1,...,N. Hence, the system exhibits periodic or quasi periodic rotations on the N-dimensional torus TN [2].
When K increases above zero (but remains small, ie. 0 < K < Kcr) the dynamics of the system are perturbed and for N > 3 they often become chaotic [7]. This transition to chaos occurs in accordance to the Afraimovich-Shilnikov torus breakdown scenario. When Kcr < K < Kc we always get a stable periodic orbit.